2016-12-07 2 views

ответ

1

Это может быть возможно с помощью MockBehavior.Strict. Я создал доказательство концепции.

[TestClass] 
    public class UnitTest1 
    { 
     public interface ITestInterface 
     { 
      int Bar { get; set; } 
      void Foo(int foo); 
     } 


     [TestMethod] 
     public void TestMethod1() 
     { 
      Mock<ITestInterface> mock = new Mock<ITestInterface>(MockBehavior.Strict); 
      mock.Setup(a => a.Foo(3)); 
      mock.Setup(a => a.Bar) 
       .Returns(3); 


      bool t1 = mock.HasSetupFor((m) => m.Foo(3)); 
      bool t2 = mock.HasSetupFor((m) => m.Bar); 
     } 
    } 

    public static class MockExtension 
    { 
     public static bool HasSetupFor<T>(this Mock<T> value, Action<T> expression) where T : class 
     { 
      if (value.Behavior != MockBehavior.Strict) 
       throw new InvalidOperationException("Behaviour must be strict"); 

      bool hasSetup = true; 

      try 
      { 
       expression(value.Object); 
      } 
      catch(MockException) 
      { 
       hasSetup = false; 
      } 

      return hasSetup; 
     } 

     public static bool HasSetupFor<TMock, TResult>(this Mock<TMock> value, Func<TMock, TResult> expression) where TMock : class 
     { 
      if (value.Behavior != MockBehavior.Strict) 
       throw new InvalidOperationException("Behaviour must be strict"); 

      bool hasSetup = true; 

      try 
      { 
       TResult tmp = expression(value.Object); 
      } 
      catch (MockException) 
      { 
       hasSetup = false; 
      } 

      return hasSetup; 
     } 
    } 
Смежные вопросы