Интересно, извлекает ли Bio.Entrezefetch()
все метаданные статьи PubMed, учитывая PMID в качестве входных данных. По всем метаданным я имею в виду, имеет ли PubMed больше метаданных, чем то, что извлекает efetch()
.Получает ли efetch() eOffice Bio.Entrez все метаданные статьи PubMed?
Например, я вижу, что для PMID 23954024
, efetch()
получает аннотацию, которая содержит немного меньше информации, чем реферата на сайте PubMed (в http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23954024):
efetch()
:
"AbstractText": [
"Rotator cuff tendinopathy is a common source of shoulder pain characterised by persistent and/or recurrent problems for a proportion of sufferers. The aim of this study was to pilot the methods proposed to conduct a substantive study to evaluate the effectiveness of a self-managed loaded exercise programme versus usual physiotherapy treatment for rotator cuff tendinopathy.",
"A single-centre pragmatic unblinded parallel group pilot randomised controlled trial.",
"One private physiotherapy clinic, northern England.",
"Twenty-four participants with rotator cuff tendinopathy.",
"The intervention was a programme of self-managed loaded exercise. The control group received usual physiotherapy treatment.",
"Baseline assessment comprised the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) and the Short-Form 36, repeated three months post randomisation.",
"The recruitment target was met and the majority of participants (98%) were willing to be randomised. 100% retention was attained with all participants completing the SPADI at three months. Exercise adherence rates were excellent (90%). The mean change in SPADI score was -23.7 (95% CI -14.4 to -33.3) points for the self-managed exercise group and -19.0 (95% CI -6.0 to -31.9) points for the usual physiotherapy treatment group. The difference in three month SPADI scores was 0.1 (95% CI -16.6 to 16.9) points in favour of the usual physiotherapy treatment group.",
"In keeping with previous research which indicates the need for further evaluation of self-managed loaded exercise for rotator cuff tendinopathy, these methods and the preliminary evaluation of outcome offer a foundation and stimulus to conduct a substantive study."
],
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23954024: Abstract ЦЕЛИ: Теннипинопатия манжеты ротатора является co миллионный источник боли в плече, характеризующийся постоянными и/или повторяющимися проблемами для части страдающих. Цель этого исследования состояла в том, чтобы пилотировать методы, предлагаемые для проведения существенного исследования для оценки эффективности самоконтролируемой загруженной программы упражнений по сравнению с обычной физиотерапевтической терапией для тензинопатии манжеты ротатора.
DESIGN:
A single-centre pragmatic unblinded parallel group pilot randomised controlled trial.
SETTING:
One private physiotherapy clinic, northern England.
PARTICIPANTS:
Twenty-four participants with rotator cuff tendinopathy.
INTERVENTIONS:
The intervention was a programme of self-managed loaded exercise. The control group received usual physiotherapy treatment.
MAIN OUTCOMES:
Baseline assessment comprised the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) and the Short-Form 36, repeated three months post randomisation.
RESULTS:
The recruitment target was met and the majority of participants (98%) were willing to be randomised. 100% retention was attained with all participants completing the SPADI at three months. Exercise adherence rates were excellent (90%). The mean change in SPADI score was -23.7 (95% CI -14.4 to -33.3) points for the self-managed exercise group and -19.0 (95% CI -6.0 to -31.9) points for the usual physiotherapy treatment group. The difference in three month SPADI scores was 0.1 (95% CI -16.6 to 16.9) points in favour of the usual physiotherapy treatment group.
CONCLUSIONS:
In keeping with previous research which indicates the need for further evaluation of self-managed loaded exercise for rotator cuff tendinopathy, these methods and the preliminary evaluation of outcome offer a foundation and stimulus to conduct a substantive study.
(OBJECTIVES
, DESIGN
, SETTING
и т.д. отсутствуют efetch()
«s реферата.)
Какие другие метаданные делает efetch()
промаха, и есть ли способ программно получить недостающую информацию?